<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RAW Deal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tonywublog.com/20100109/raw-deal.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tonywublog.com/20100109/raw-deal.html</link>
	<description>Pix and Thoughts about Underwater Photography &#038; Stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:58:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.tonywublog.com/20100109/raw-deal.html/comment-page-1#comment-7307</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 08:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tonywublog.com/?p=2616#comment-7307</guid>
		<description>Matt, you&#039;re a genius (ok, not really). In the Lens Aberration Correction, the Peripheral Illumination function seems to be checked by default.

Uncheck it, and the apparent vignetting disappears!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, you&#8217;re a genius (ok, not really). In the Lens Aberration Correction, the Peripheral Illumination function seems to be checked by default.</p>
<p>Uncheck it, and the apparent vignetting disappears!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.tonywublog.com/20100109/raw-deal.html/comment-page-1#comment-7306</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 08:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tonywublog.com/?p=2616#comment-7306</guid>
		<description>Did you have Lens Aberration Correction enabled in DPP? It may have gotten confused and overcompensated - recommend disabling in that case.

I never had any issues in DPP when I tested that combination (10-17, 10-17+1.4x) on a 1DsIII.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you have Lens Aberration Correction enabled in DPP? It may have gotten confused and overcompensated &#8211; recommend disabling in that case.</p>
<p>I never had any issues in DPP when I tested that combination (10-17, 10-17+1.4x) on a 1DsIII.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.tonywublog.com/20100109/raw-deal.html/comment-page-1#comment-7258</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 03:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tonywublog.com/?p=2616#comment-7258</guid>
		<description>Yup, DPP has the best colour rendition, but it&#039;s difficult to use and has little quirks like this. Other software programs are more user-friendly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, DPP has the best colour rendition, but it&#8217;s difficult to use and has little quirks like this. Other software programs are more user-friendly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.tonywublog.com/20100109/raw-deal.html/comment-page-1#comment-7257</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 03:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tonywublog.com/?p=2616#comment-7257</guid>
		<description>wow, the colour rendition is night and day</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, the colour rendition is night and day</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
