I received a question asking whether it’s ok to use a teleconverter (TC) to take super-macro photos. Actually, I get asked about this often, so I figured it’s worth writing a bit about this topic.
Using TCs is no big mystery. Essentially, you’re using an additional lens to increase the magnification of your primary lens…sort of a lens on top of a lens.
There are pros and cons to this arrangement. On the positive side, you can achieve greater magnification than without using them, which means you can shoot smaller subjects, or reveal greater detail of any given subject.
On the negative side, you’re adding more glass, which means a drop in quality and quantity of light transmission, the extent of which depends on the quality of the particular TC you’re using. Colour, sharpness and such do suffer, but it’s manageable and worth the trade off if you’re going for shots that otherwise wouldn’t be possible.
In practical terms, you can achieve great macro results with teleconverters…just keep a few things in mind.
First, use the best primary lens you can. For my Canon system, this usually means the 100mm f2.8 macro lens. The equivalent in the Nikon world is the 105mm f2.8 macro lens.
Next, you’ll need to use manual focus in most cases (getting the right gears and ports may be a challenge). Teleconverters reduce the amount of light reaching your camera’s sensor, which makes autofocus relatively more difficult, especially if you’re in low light to begin with, at high magnification, and/ or shooting something with low contrast (quite often, you have to contend with all three of these things at the same time). If you rely on AF, it’ll probably be slow, and may end up “hunting” before locking focus.
Second, hike your ISO up a bit to help your strobes out. Third, open up your aperture to maximise light transmission. Normally, I start with f5.6 on-camera reading and close down from there, depending on the ambient conditions and desired result.
Finally, camera shake can be a real problem, so ideally, you should be in a situation where you are stable. Shooting super-macro while hovering in mid-water simply isn’t feasible. And use a relatively high shutter speed. For example, 1/160-1/200 is the strobe sync speed for my Canon EOS 5D.
To illustrate, here are a few sample images I took using teleconverters (all with Canon 100mm f2.8 macro lens plus various TCs):

The challenge here was low light, low visibility, and a frickin’ small nudibranch that wouldn’t stop moving.

I adore gobies. The primary challenge is spending sufficient time with the fish to become friends.

If you get really good with manual focus, you can learn to focus on rapidly moving subjects too, though you’ll have to expect a higher miss-ratio than for more cooperative targets.

Getting in-camera high magnification is the best reason to use teleconverters.








Geez, I feel selfish asking a question when you’re “so tired you can’t even see cross-eyed.” But, when you’re up to it . . . for the Canon 100mm macro lens, are you familiar with the Tamron 2X SP AF teleconverter? Any opinion on that one or another choice?
Hi Ken,
Sorry, I haven’t used that particular teleconverter. I’ve used Canon and Kenko TCs, which work fine. If you decide on the Tamron, let me know what you think after you’ve used it
Cheers,
Tony
nice post Tony, I love the nudibranch gills. I use the Tamron 1.4x SP pro, it’s exactly the same as the Kenko 1.4x PRO, simply rebranded. I can’t speak about the Tamron 2x though.
Hi! Great post!
Just a question, if you use 1.4TC the magnification would increase by 1.4? The same goes for 2x TC?
Basically yes. But just check to make sure your lens is compatible with whatever TC you’re interested in.
Thanks for the quick reply!
I’ll be using a Canon 100mm 2.8.
You have the same lens right?
What were the various TC you used and were there significant loss in optical quality?