Archive for 2011

My Top 10 Underwater Photographs for 2011

Putting together Top 10 lists is a popular thing for websites to do at the end of the year.

I generally avoid trends, but I like this one, because the process of stepping back and getting perspective on what you’ve experienced and achieved over the preceding 12 months is an excellent way to set goals for the upcoming year.

It’s also a nice opportunity to recap and share some highlights of the year…to recall the good times, as well as the challenges.

I’ve just skimmed through my blog posts from 2011, and picked out ten of my favourite photos, listed in chronological order.

The first is this image of Ron Leidich and Terry Ward in the entrance of one of the hidden lakes in Palau’s Rock Islands:

Entrance to hidden lake in Palau rock islands
Ron and Terry in a tunnel leading to a hidden lake in Palau’s Rock Islands

I like this picture because it encapsulates everything about the unique and educational experience I had in February of exploring Palau by kayak. Getting into and out of concealed lakes was often a logistical challenge, to say nothing of the difficulty involved in documenting the experience with photos.

To capture this image, I had to swim several times between our mother boat and the island in order to haul my gear up and over sharp rocks and hydroids into the narrow opening, then get Ron and Terry into position and set up the lighting before ambient light levels fell and the incoming tide trapped us.

We were on a tight schedule and only had one try, with a window of 20, no more than 30, minutes, so I was elated (shocked almost!) when the shot actually worked.

The second photo I picked from the trip is a more traditional underwater image of a coral reef in shallow water.

Thriving coral reef in an area that was devastated by El Niño in 1998 and crown of thorns thereafter
Thriving coral reef in an area that was devastated by
El Niño in 1998 and crown of thorns thereafter

It’s not technique, lighting, composition, etc. that makes this photo stand out for me. It’s the fact that this reef is living testimony to the tremendous self-healing and recovery capability of Mother Nature. It’s a symbol of hope…a reef system that defied all the doom-and-gloom, end-of-days pronouncements by experts in the wake of the massive El Niño in 1998. It’s cause for optimism.

Next up are two photos of Australian sea lions (Neophoca cinerea), the first of a friendly young sea lion coming in to give my camera a neighborly nuzzle and kiss:

Young Australian sea lion coming in for a kiss
Young Australian sea lion coming in for a kiss

…and the second of two sea lions play-fighting:

Two fighting Australian sea lions
Two male sea lions having a friendly discussion

I love interacting with pinnipeds, and these two photos taken together show the extremes of their behaviour. If you’re a dog-lover like me, you’ll have no problem imagining what it’s like to swim with these precocious animals. It’s like being surrounded by hyperactive labrador retrievers…except that you’re in the water, and they can swim (a lot!) better than you.

A shadow hung over my time with the sea lions this year, as the earthquake+tsunami+nuclear reactor meltdowns in Japan took place just as I arrived in Western Australia, but the fact that I was with great friends (including three terrific kids who had an absolute blast with the sea lions) helped to balance things out.

I’m planning a return visit in March 2013, so let me know if you’re interested.

Pretty soon after playing with the sea lions, I took an exploratory trip to Sri Lanka, where I had some amazing luck. Among the highlights was an encounter with a manta ray that head-butted me twice:

Rear view of a manta ray feeding at the ocean surface
Rear view of a manta ray feeding at the ocean surface

I like this angle, because it’s different from most manta images. It took a lot of swimming and a number of attempts to get the manta’s tail lined up just right, when the tips of both of the animal’s wings were out of the water.

The back story of this head-butting manta is interesting, and worth a read if you like enigmas. Naturally, there was some debate about whether the manta really made a sound or not before colliding with me.

I’m 100% certain of what I heard, and there was another person in the water with me who heard/ saw the exact same things. Capt. Craig of Golden Dawn also reported a similar sound from a manta in PNG; I’ve appended a note to my original blog post with Craig’s comments. Have a read, and please let me know if you come across mantas (or other rays) making odd sounds.

Also during that trip, I managed to swim through the biggest cloud of sperm whale poo I’ve come across so far. You gotta admit, it’s impressive!

This is the biggest dump I've ever seen from a sperm whale.
This is the biggest dump I’ve ever seen from a sperm whale.

You might think it odd that I’d pick such a photo for my ten favourites of the year, but c’mon, no one can resist gawking at that enormous effluent emission.

As if batoid head-butts and odontocete defecation weren’t amazing enough, I had the mind-blowing experience of having two blue whales swim toward me, slow down to make eye contact, wish me a good day, then merrily carry on with their official whale business:

Blue whales swimming in blue water
Blue whales(!) swimming in blue water

In case there was any doubt, I can confirm that blue whales are…big!

Then it was off to Papua New Guinea, where I spent a month aboard MV Golden Dawn, harassing Captain Craig and Bob Halstead.

I didn’t do much macro photography this year, but on this trip, I nailed a super-macro shot of Dinah’s goby (Lubricogobius dinah), a fish I’ve been wanting to photograph for a decade or so:

Super-macro shot of Dinah's goby (Lubricogobius dinah)
Super-macro shot of Dinah’s goby (Lubricogobius dinah)

Photographing Dinah’s goby involved using a rebreather, lugging an elaborate camera set-up, and putting in some deco time, but it was worth the effort. Bob and Dinah Halstead documented this fish and had it described, so it was an honour to have Bob find the fish for me, and to be able to help Bob get a print made for Dinah!

My final two picks for the year are from Tonga. It was such an amazing season, with a record 48 humpback whale mother/ calf pair IDs, that it’s extremely difficult to select just two photos.

This picture is special because the adult female is one that I first photographed and ID-ed in 2009. I recognised her immediately on sight. She had the same even-keeled temperament that she did two seasons ago, and her calf was playful, confident and friendly, just like her calf in 2009.

Humpback whale mother and calf in Tonga
Toluua, humpback whale calf #32 of the 2011 season, with mommy

And last but not least, I am quite fond of this photo of a male humpback whale singing:

Fluke of a humpback whale singer
Fluke of a humpback whale singer

I’ve spent time with and photographed a lot of singers, but this had to be the most cooperative one ever. From the moment we made eye contact, I could tell that the whale didn’t mind my presence. The white along the sides of its body, and the curly, twisty scar on the right side of its fluke really give the whale character, making for a beautiful portrait of a beautiful animal.

Well…there are certainly many more photos that I liked, but a Top 47 list doesn’t have quite the same ring to it as Top 10 does.

All of these images are more than just pictures to me. They are reminders of incredible experiences, of memories and lessons learned that no amount of money can buy, of another year well spent exploring the world, making friends, and…hopefully…becoming a better photographer and person.

A Christmas Tail

Here’s a happy holiday story for you. This has nothing to do with underwater photography, but I hope it inspires some appropriately warm, mushy feelings for the festive season.

The protagonist in this tale is Muji, a feline friend I made in 1999, pictured here sunning himself in the swank London apartment where he now resides:

Cat sunning himself in window sill
Muji sunning himself at his London residence

Muji started life as a homeless street kitty in Holland Village in Singapore, where, one balmy evening, he decided to enlist my assistance to better his lot in life.

I was standing on the sidewalk, talking with a friend after dinner. Just as I was about to head to my car, I felt something rub my ankle. I looked down and saw a scrawny little kitten, barely big enough to cover the palm of my hand, rubbing itself against my ankles, wrapping its tiny tail around me while making that low-pitched, deep-throated gurgling sound that furry felines specialise in.

Kneeling down, I picked the kitten up by the scruff of its neck and did a quick visual inspection. Male. Ears, nose, eyes, paws, teeth…all clean. No scratches or wounds. No fleas. No ticks. Perfectly normal, other than the fact that it was far too small to be on its own.

I spun around several times in search of a mommy cat or sibling kittens. No luck. There were no homes nearby, so it probably wasn’t lost.

Growing anxious, I held the kitten out to passersby and asked if it belonged to them. All I got were strange looks. More than a few people hurried away, with callous disregard for the plight of an increasingly desperate man, standing in the middle of the pavement, at night, holding a kitten, calling out to anyone who would listen.

After a while, my muscles started to fatigue from holding said kitten out at arms length, so I placed it in the crook of my left arm. Kitty pushed and pulled, shifted and shoved to make a few adjustments to my limb position, then snuggled in, gurgled, purred…and fell asleep.

That was how I came to be the owner of a cat.

Cat curled up asleep
This is how Muji got me to adopt him

When I first took Muji home, Pasta (my golden retriever) sauntered over for a salutory sniff, as amiable goldens are wont to do. Tiny though he was, Muji hissed and growled up a storm, leaving no room for doubt about who was top dog now (so to speak), giving poor Pasta a considerable fright in the process.

Muji’s less-than-cordial initial greeting made Pasta a nervous wreck for a few days, until the two reached an inter-species détente of sorts and learned to like one another (meaning Muji used Pasta as a fluff pillow while Pasta accepted her fate with stoic canine dignity).

Somewhat unusual for a cat, Muji stayed with me 24/7. He followed me everywhere. His favourite activity (besides sneaking up on Pasta and snickering when she jumped) was sitting on my shoulder, going along for the ride wherever I walked, drove or sat.

Instead of a footloose and carefree pirate with a multi-hued parrot on his shoulder, picture a Chinese guy with scrawny stray cat on his shoulder.

Muji and I shared many (mis)adventures together…far too many to relate here…but one in particular stands out…the day I gave Muji a shower.

It seemed like a good idea at the time. Pasta, after all, was enjoying her weekly shower, basking in the spray of water as I hosed the suds off her in our driveway. It was sunny; sparrows were chirping. It was the perfect day to shampoo one’s four-legged friends.

When the first drop of water touched Muji, he screamed. Literally so loud that I’m sure everyone within a kilometre heard him. Up until then, I wasn’t aware that cats were capable of screaming, but it seems that they’re pretty good at it when the occasion warrants. Go figure.

Anyway, Muji was still a tiny tyke, so I was able to hold him down during his involuntary ablution, suffering only a thousand or so scratches on my forearms in the process.

When all was said and done, I had the cleanest, best smelling cat in Singapore. It was therefore somewhat unfortunate that Muji was far too incensed to appreciate the faint bouquet of lilac that wafted up whenever he slunk by.

For many days thereafter, Muji wouldn’t come near me, much less sit on my shoulder. He scowled, snarled and sulked, refusing to acknowledge my existence (except at meal times of course).

It took a contrite apology and sincere promise from me never to inflict such an indignity upon him again (along with a good chunk of catnip) for Muji to let bygones be bygones and re-establish his quasi-permanent perch on my clavicle.

Cat on a cabinet
Muji on a cabinet in his new home

Along came the day when I had to prepare for an extended trip. Pasta had quite a few friends she could go stay with, but I needed to find someone to take care of Muji. Fortunately, Yoko-san, a friend who lived not too far away, agreed to take him in.

I have to confess that when I dropped Muji off, I felt a pang of separation anxiety, exacerbated by a nagging concern that my little kitten might suffer trauma at being abandoned…especially given his origins as a stray.

To make a long story short…Muji and Yoko-san got along famously. In fact, they got along so well that when I went back to pick Muji up and was about to leave with kitten (and kitty bed, kitty food, kitty litter, kitty toys, kitty treats, kitty blankets, kitty pillows, etc.) in tow, I saw a tear forming in the corner of Yoko-san’s eye.

Now…here’s the thing. Fond as I was of the young lad, it wasn’t never my intention to have a cat. My dog was responsibility enough, and the most important thing to me was to ensure that Muji had a good home.

In fact, the reason I named Muji Muji was that the term is a contraction of “Mujirushi” (無印), the name of a brand in Japan, which literally translates to “no name”. In other words, I didn’t want to name Muji, because I didn’t want to get attached.

Sensing opportunity, I asked Yoko-san if she wanted to adopt a kitten. The answer was obvious.

So that was how Yoko-san came to be the owner of a cat.

Two cats sleeping together
Yoko-san eventually became the owner of two cats

After Muji settled in with his new family, another stray kitten joined them, and they’ve been living the good life ever since.

From his humble beginnings as a homeless street kitty, Muji has come a long way. After enjoying a peaceful, pampered life in Singapore (with the minor exception of the aforementioned shower incident) and Japan, Muji has most recently taken up residence in London (via cross-continental flight Tokyo to Paris, hotel in Paris to recover, car ride to Calais, ferry to Dover, car ride to London), where he’s looking forward to many a new adventure, good English food (or maybe not), and lots of lazy afternoon naps.

On that happy note, permit me this opportunity to wish you a happy holiday season, and a wonderful new year ahead.

Cat in window sill looking outside
Muji surveying his new domain

Humpback Whale Singer Audio

Locating humpback whale singers underwater is a challenge, but it’s fun. There’s nothing quite like tracking down a singer bit-by-bit, swimming along, scanning the water until the vague outline of a cetacean emerges from the misty blue haze.

Sound travels so well underwater that it’s extremely difficult to gauge direction and distance. Also, singers can stay down for extended periods of time, often diving too deep to see, sometimes swimming as they sing, sometimes sitting in plain sight but countershaded so well that you cruise right past them.

We found 14 singers this season, which is pretty high. Single-digit tallies are more common, not necessarily because there aren’t more singers around, but due in large part to the amount of time and effort it takes to track a singing whale down.

We came across the first singer of the season on 13 August, pictured below:

Humpback whale singer, Tonga 2011. Note the lopsided fluke.
First humpback whale singer I came across in the 2011 season.
Note the lopsided fluke.

The water wasn’t clear (bad viz. characterised the season), but the whale wasn’t too deep, about 15m (around 50ft) or less at the fluke from what I remember. It stuck around long enough for everyone to get a good look, and for my friends Debbie and George to record some video. (Debbie actually recorded the video. It was enough for George just to stay out of the way.)

They just forwarded me the following audio tracks of the singer, which they extracted from the video footage (Thanks Debbie, George!).

It may not come across in these recordings, but it seemed like the bass this year wasn’t as deep and booming as normal. I hung directly overhead this one and several others this season, and I didn’t get the same intense reverberation in my body as I have in the past.

Here’s a video from the 2010 season showing what it’s like to make a short courtesy call to a singing humpback whale. This one was considerably deeper, 20-25m at the fluke.

10 Tips to Help You Win Photo Contests

The winners of the 2011 Ocean Art Photo Contest were just announced a few days ago.

If you get a chance, it’s worth clicking through to take a look at the selected photographs. There are some real “crackers” among them…to borrow a term that Marty Snyderman used many times during our group chat with fellow judges Martin Edge and Bonnie Pelnar, along with contest organisers Scott Gietler and Michael Zeigler.

The judging process for competitions like this is opaque, at least to people who submit photos. After you enter a contest, the next thing you hear is either “Congratulations, your image placed!”, or nothing. Zip. Crickets.

In either instance, you might scratch your head and wonder why your photo was selected or why it wasn’t, as the case may be.

This can be frustrating. Especially if you’re looking to enter more contests in the future and could do with some feedback on the things you did well, as well as hints on how you could improve your odds of success.

I’ve had the honour of helping to judge several contests in recent months (DEEP Indonesia, Underwater Festival, Ocean Art) so I thought I’d share a few pointers as a means of providing some insight into how photos are selected or weeded out…pre-game mental prep for next year’s contests, so to speak.

One caveat…the thoughts below are personal; they are things that affect my decision process. I am not in any way speaking for any of the other judges or contest organisers, so please don’t give them grief if you take issue with anything I’ve written.

Whether you find yourself nodding and thinking: “Go figure. Tony actually has some good points” or shaking your head in disgust and sighing: “What an numbskull,” I hope the issues I raise below will be thought-provoking and perhaps even help with your entries in upcoming contests.

For what it’s worth, following are some of the key points that go through my mind when looking through photos.

1. Weed Out the Obvious
I’m referring to things like out-of-focus images, poorly lit photos, blurry shots (not intentionally so), and other basic issues with the techniques and mechanics of photography. In many contests, the organisers pre-screen entries, so a lot of these get taken out before the judges see them. But sometimes a few slip through, and in some cases, there isn’t any pre-screening.

To cut to the chase…there’s just no point entering images with issues like these. I know, that’s harsh, but in order to stand a chance in any decent competition, you need to be your own worst critic.

If you find it difficult to be cold-hearted and objective about your own images, try to find someone you trust who can tell you: “This sucks!” without hurting your feelings.

Bonus points if that person can explain why as well.

2. Weigh the Subtle
These are considerations like composition (just a tad to the right, cropped a bit tighter, etc.), overall eye-catchiness (a bit hard to define, but obvious when you see it), minor blemishes and irritants.

Subtle issues are things that could go either way, depending to a large extent on the level of competition. What I usually do is take a quick run through all the images in a given category and make an initial gut assessment of overall quality level.

I don’t pick any photos. I just make a mental note of whether the category is say super strong, so-so, weak, etc. When I go back through to do a first cut, the stronger the entries are, the harsher I am with subtle points.

Images in a photo competition are, after all, judged against peer entries.

Here’s one example of something that might sway my opinion: Say you have a mind-blowing photograph of a bunch of manta rays taken near the surface, but just visible in the background is a diver with his head out of the water…so what you see, in effect, is a headless diver. This doesn’t necessarily mean I’ll cut the photo in question, but if there are other strong entries in the category, it’ll definitely affect my decision.

3. Bemoan the Tragic
In every contest I’ve helped judge, there have been great photographs that were entered into the wrong category. In the most recent Ocean Art Photo Contest, there was a very nice photo entered into the Marine Life Behavior category, one that I immediately pegged as a high quality entry.

The thing is, when we got together via the magic of the internet to discuss our choices, we came to the reluctant consensus that the photo didn’t actually show any behavior per se. Had it been entered in the Portrait category, I’d wager that it would’ve been among the top choices.

Bummer…because I really liked the photo and wanted to give it recognition. (Translation: I whined, but the other judges were correct.)

I suppose this goes without saying, but when you enter a competition, it’s a good idea to read the category descriptions and ensure that you put your images up for consideration in the most appropriate one.

4. Nix Xerox Shots
There is a fine line between emulating someone’s photo style, and just plain copying it. One of the advantages of being involved with several major contest is that I’ve seen lots of images. I don’t always pick up on photos that are straight copies of other winning photos, but when I do, I immediately cut them. No questions asked.

I might be more of a stickler about this than other people are, but to me, photography is art. Art, by definition, requires originality.

There’s certainly nothing wrong with studying other people’s images and learning from them (in fact, that’s the best way to improve), but if you want your images to receive recognition in a competition, avoid using the Xerox machine.

5. Bin Trendy Shots
Trends and fads come and go. I hate fads of all types, not just ones pertaining to photography. Fads can be subjects; fads can be techniques; fads can be places. But in all cases, fads are easy to recognise, and they’re bad…especially in the context of entering contests.

With the ease of communication and information flow facilitated by the internet these days, it’s particularly easy to sucked into the latest trend. There is absolutely nothing wrong with going to the latest “in” destination, photographing the latest “cool” animal, or trying the latest “new” gadget, but just keep in mind that when everyone is visiting the same place, photographing the same animal, or using the same tool…it’s difficult for your image to stand out from the crowd, because by definition, fads foster conformity, not originality.

An example here is the use of snoots. Snoots are not new or original by a long shot. In recent months though, they’ve become an “in” thing, with lots of photos that were obviously taken with a snoot showing up on the net and in contests. Whenever I see a photo with an overexposed spot/ cone of light surrounded by black, I want to gag.

Don’t get me wrong. I have used snoots and snoot-like instruments for dog years, and I love them. But the thing about snoots is that they are tools. They are not magic sauce that makes an otherwise dull photo into a prize-winning image.

And as with the use of other tools, it’s usually best when the result is subtle. In other words, if the first reaction that someone has when looking at your photo is: “Oh, you used a snoot”, then the tool has overpowered the subject.

Photography is about subjects, not tools.

6. View Greyscale/ Monochrome Shots with Scepticism
If you greyscale an underwater image or convert it to black and white, there has to be a good reason. Too often, people do this just because the visibility is bad. That’s not a good reason; bad viz. is just part of underwater photography.

There are certainly some images that work well in greyscale or black/ white, but shooting in monochrome is a different discipline, requiring a dedicated thought process/ approach, and in many respects, can be more difficult than photography in colour. This is true whether you’re shooting underwater or on land.

Simply using software to change colour to monochrome doesn’t cut it in most cases for underwater images.

If by converting your image to monochrome, you bring out an important point or evoke a feeling/ emotion that wouldn’t work in colour…terrific! But if that point, feeling, etc. isn’t immediately obvious, don’t bother.

7. Consider Photo Quality Over Subject Matter
Photo competitions are first and foremost about photo quality.

This may sound like a “duh” statement, but there are always photos that appear to have been entered for subject matter rather than photo quality.

Photos of big animals most often fit this description, but this also applies to photos of rare animals or amazing events.

Big animals have charisma and presence, so as subjects go, they stand out. More people can relate to sharks, rays, dolphins, whales, and such than to teeny-tiny crustaceans, for instance. But there isn’t an automatic hierarchy that dictates that big animal shots are better than small animal shots.

Ditto for amazing events like the Sardine Run, sailfish in Isla Mujeres, mantas at Hanifaru, whale sharks in Cenderawasih, and so forth.

It’s easy to get carried away by the excitement of seeing amazing events, or getting a photo of a great white shark, but in my book at least, if you enter a photograph of a big animal or spectacle, the picture has to be more than good. It has to be out-of-this-world fantastic (like this winning manta image taken by Tobias Friedrich).

Bottom line…I’ll always choose a fantastic shot of a smaller animal over a mediocre photo of megafauna or mega-event.

8. Look for Originality
By this stage, I will have reduced the number of photos to a manageable number, and I’ll shift gears from looking for reasons to toss out entries to seeking reasons to choose winners.

The first thing I look for is originality. This is, in a way, the inverse of #4 above.

There is no easy way to define originality, but I know it when I see it. Look at the winning photos in any decent photo contest, and there will be a high originality quotient.

As but one example, look at this winning photo in the Nudibranch Category, taken by Salvatore Ianniello.

The radiating tube worm “ceiling” made this shot stand out like a penguin in Times Square. Maybe someone else has taken an image like this before, but I haven’t seen one like it. It was an instant “Like!” for me.

9. Look for the Wow! Factor
A related, difficult-to-describe attribute I look for is the Wow! factor. Perhaps above all else, this is the single most important ingredient in a prize-winning photo.

It’s the quality in an image that makes you stop, take a second look, and mutter “wooooow” as you stare at the picture. It’s often an intangible quality not attributable to any one factor, but is something that’s conveyed by the entirety of the photo in question.

Again, take a look at the winners of any photo contest, and you should experience a number of “oooooh” and “aaaaaah” moments.

10. Listen to the Force
Finally, it comes down to personal choice.

The best competitions receive lots of technically perfect entries that are original and have Wow!-factor appeal.

Every judge has different likes and dislikes, so given the same pool of photos, it’s highly unlikely that any two judges will come up with the same selections. In the most recent contest judging, I had a chance to group chat/ discuss with the other judges, which was useful and fun, as it allowed us to exchange views and share observations about photos that we felt deserved recognition.

Listening to the reasons why someone else liked a photo changed my perspective in a few instances. As with many aspects of life, listening was as important as talking, if not more so.

Conclusion
So that’s it. There’s certainly nothing earth-shattering in what I’ve spelled out, but I hope that writing out some of my thoughts will help shed a little light on what happens behind the scenes, not just in this most recent competition, but for all photo contests in general.

While the list above applies just to me, and there are some points that are unique to underwater photography, I suspect that most judges for most photo contests go through a similar mental process.

You may have already picked up on this, but the selection process is often as much, if not more, about elimination as it is about picking winners.

So when you’re deciding which photos to enter, it might be a good idea to make like you’re a judge, and edit/ cut/ select photos accordingly.

One last note before wrapping up…always bear in mind that if your photo wasn’t picked, it doesn’t necessarily mean your photo wasn’t good, or even great. The best contests are the ones that receive a plethora of mind-blowing entries, which often makes it impossible to give recognition to every photo that deserves it.

Santa Claus(e)

I guess I’ve been a good boy this year. Santa Clause just added me to his Google+ Circles:

Santa Clause added me to his Google+ circles :)
Santa Clause added me to his Google+ circles :)

Whales, Whales, Whales

If you’ve been following my ramblings in recent months, it’s probably obvious that I’ve been spending an increasing proportion of my time with large cetaceans. My schedule for next year is no exception, with 12 to 13 weeks or so planned for sitting on a boat staring at the ocean hoping something will show up whale photography.

For those of you who are crazy enough to contemplate joining me on one of these adventures, I’ve set out basic trip descriptions below.

If you read on, you’ll no doubt notice that many of the trips are already booked. This is because I keep a list of people who contact me in advance, and I do my best to get in touch with anyone who’s expressed interest before announcing trips on my blog. I also send out an e-newsletter in advance of posting to this site.

If you’d like to get a heads-up for future trips, please contact me via my contact form, or sign up for my trip newsletter.

Please let me know if you’re interested, even if the itinerary you’re keen on is full, as I keep a wait list for each of the trips. Life happens sometimes, and people who’ve signed up end up needing to change their plans.

Blue Whales, Sperm Whales in Sri Lanka
Dates: March/ April 2012
Availability: Fully booked

This trip requires someone who is accustomed to less-than-ideal circumstances, can deal with frustration, and can accept the possibility of being totally and utterly skunked.

Sounds like fun, no?

To be a good fit for this adventure, you need to be very, very experienced in the water, be easy-going and cooperative, and have a stable, mature personality.

On the upside, there is the prospect of seeing scenes like the images below, as well as other potential surprises:

Sperm whale swimming upside-down to check me out with sonar
Sperm whale swimming upside-down to check me out with sonar

Blue whales(!) swimming in blue water
Blue whales(!) swimming in blue water

Minke Whales in Australia
Dates: 28 June to 7 July
Availability: One spot available
Location: Fly into/ out of Cairns, transfer to Port Douglas
Accommodation: Liveaboard trip

Minke whales have been on my to-do list for a long time. As far as baleen whales go, they’re relatively small, running six to ten metres in length. They’re inquisitive…as in, they’ll come right up to boats and people in the water given the right mood. They’re also reasonably easy to find…if you get the timing and location right.

For these reasons, I’ve planned a trip Down Under to spend some quality time with the minkes that congregate at the Great Barrier Reef.

We're heading over during absolute peak minke whale season
We’re heading over during absolute peak minke whale season.

The plan is to get on a boat in Port Douglas on 28 June, cruise overnight to minke central and sit there until we leave on 6 July to head back. That’s eight full days with minkes, only minkes, and just minkes.

We’ll be in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, so we’ll be following the well-established guidelines for in-water interactions with the small cetaceans, letting the whales dictate the pace and proximity of interactions.

I specifically picked the timing for this trip based on advice from my friends John Rumney, who is one of the leading authorities on minkes Down Under, and Julia Sumerling, who has many years of minke experience under her belt from working as the video/ photo pro on Mike Ball’s boat.

To cut to the chase, our trip will be during peak, peak minke time.

For whatever reason, the minkes show up like clockwork at this time, and more importantly, they demonstrate the greatest level of interest in people around this period.

Incidentally, the minkes in this area are a subspecies known as dwarf minke whales, which were first described in 1986. From what I gather, there is still no population estimate for this subspecies, and no consensus on the taxonomy for minke whales in general.

For more information about the dwarf minkes, please see the excellent summary prepared by the CRC Reef Research Centre (PDF file).

Minkes are curious, and some will approach really close
Minkes are inquisitive, and some will approach really close.

Humpbacks Whales in Alaska
Dates: 22 to 31 July
Availability: Fully booked
Location: Trip begins and ends at Juneau, Alaska
Accommodation: Liveaboard

This is the Megaptera Mania! trip I’m running with Jon Cornforth.

I’m really excited about heading to Alaska for the first time. I’m not so keen on the fact that it’ll be colder than I normally like, but bubble-net feeding and dramatic, mountainous terrain in the background will hopefully make it worthwhile, and also worth a repeat visit in 2013.

Humpback whales bubble-feeding at sunset in Alaska
Humpback whales bubble-feeding at sunset in Alaska

Humpback whale breaching in Alaska
Humpback whale breaching in Alaska

Humpback Whales in Tonga
As soon as we wrap up in Alaska, I’ll be heading over to Tonga for my annual stay, and to continue my calf count project. After the record number of baby whales I ID-ed this year, I can’t wait to see what happens in 2012!

My schedule for Tonga is still evolving, but here’s how it looks at this time:

Trip 1: 21 to 28 August. This is the second part of the Megaptera Mania! trip. Fully booked.
Trip 2: 29 August to 06 September. Two spots available.
Trip 3: 08 to 17 September. Fully booked.
Trip 4: 25 September to 3 October. Four spots available.

Tahafa, calf #14 of the 2011 season, with mommy
Tahafa, calf #14 of the 2011 season, with mommy

Fluke of a humpback whale singer
Fluke of a humpback whale singer

Eastern Fields Trip

A couple of places have opened up for one of the trips I’m leading to the Eastern Fields in PNG in association with Wetpixel. [Update 5 Jan: Spots filled]

The trip is for 10 to 20 January 2012, aboard MV Golden Dawn. We’ll be heading out to a submerged coral reef atoll system in the middle of the Coral Sea, where the corals are unspoiled and fish teeming, like this:

Millions of fish at Carl's Ultimate dive site in the Eastern Fields of Papua New Guinea
This is what my favourite dive site
in the Eastern Fields looks like when it’s rockin’

The photo above is from the most intense, fish-filled, absolutely insane reef dive I’ve ever done, at a site in the Eastern Fields called Carl’s Ultimate, named for my friend and mentor Carl Roessler. There’s so much action that you’ll want to go right back in (or, if you’re on rebreather like me, you’ll just stay in for three hours or so at a time, come up to scarf down cookies and chocolate cake, then drop in for another three hours).

To give you a better sense of the diving in the Eastern Fields, below is a video from my previous visit. I’ve posted this before, but in case you haven’t seen it, please take a quick look:

If you have time next January, this is an amazing trip that’s sure to knock your dive socks off.

Please get in touch with Dan Baldocchi for more information, or send me a message via my contact form.

Lots of fish and pristine corals at Carl's Ultimate dive site in the Eastern Fields of PNG
…and hungry predators like this is why the small fish need to swim quickly

Update: Requests for Free Photographs

One thing that I forgot to mention in my post yesterday was the time I’ve been spending on maintaining the Reasons Why Professional Photographers Cannot Work for Free site that I set up a few weeks ago.

What started as a small project to give my friends and me an easy link to send out and save time when we receive requests for free images has mushroomed into a major(!) undertaking.

There are now hundreds of signatories from around the world, representing many different types of photography, and the text has been translated into 11 languages so far. Many photographers have written to tell me that the text has already worked for them, and I know the template has been reproduced and/ or modified and posted on a bunch of major photography forums and sites.

I’ve spent a lot of time updating the site, answering emails, and looking through URLs featuring amazing images created by the photographers who’ve written in. (If you have a bit of free time, click a few of the signatory links to peruse the sites.)

Form letter for photographers to respond to requests for free images
Form letter for photographers to respond to requests for free images

From this experience, one thing has become extremely clear…the explosion in requests (sometimes demands) for free or dirt-cheap images is a global phenomenon that affects photographers in all areas (and other creative artists as well). I of course knew that this was a growing problem, but I didn’t really appreciate how extensive and insidious it’s already become.

I’m certainly not naive enough to believe that one template letter will fix this problem, but I’m pretty sure that it will improve the lives of many photographers.

If nothing else, it’s much easier to send a link to a form letter with hundreds of signatories than it is to type a response to every request. It’s also much easier to be polite when all you’re doing is sending a link than it is when you’re responding while feeling irritated about getting yet another request.

There are a number of recurring themes in the communications I’ve received from fellow photographers, but two really stand out.

First is the sentiment that: “It’s much worse here than anywhere else,” or words to that effect. With so many photographers all around the world telling me the same thing, it stands to reason that everywhere can’t be “worse”. But since so many people feel that the problem is really bad where they are, the only logical conclusion to draw is that it’s bad just about everywhere. Sucks, huh?

Second is a sense of relief expressed as: “I thought I was the only one.” Perhaps more than the text itself, the sense of community and mutual support arising from having a common response to this all-too-common problem is something that has value.

So basically, though this has taken up far too much of my time, I’m happy that the template is up on the web for everyone to use, and it’s been great “meeting” so many photographers I probably would never have otherwise communicated with.

Oh…one additional bonus is that the site has been attracting its fair share of comment spam (all of which has been caught by WordPress’s spam filter). Most are just inane gibberish with links to libido-enhancing pharmaceutical sites and other cyberspace flotsam. Some are entertaining though.

Here’s an example of a spam comment that’s highly complimentary of my “substantially passion” and massive statement:

“This is a intelligent weblog. I mean it. You have got so significantly information about this concern, and so substantially passion. You also know the best way to make people rally behind it, certainly from the responses. Youve got a style here thats not too flashy, but makes a statement as massive as what youre saying. Fantastic job, indeed.”

I was feeling rather chuffed after reading that (for non-Poms, “chuffed” in UK-speak roughly translates to “stoked” in normal-speak).

The risk of my chuffed-ness getting out of control escalated with the following unsuccessful attempt to use flattery to get me to approve a comment (I took exception to the “probably” qualification):

“I’ve been surfing on-line greater than 3 hours today, yet I never discovered any fascinating article like yours. It’s lovely worth enough for me. In my view, if all website owners and bloggers made excellent content as you probably did, the internet shall be much more useful than ever before.”

Fortunately, the next spammer brought my blogging ego back down to earth:

“The next time I learn a blog, I hope that it doesnt disappoint me as a lot as this one. I mean, I do know it was my option to read, but I really thought youd have one thing fascinating to say. All I hear is a bunch of whining about something that you would repair for those who werent too busy on the lookout for attention.”

Whining? Who me?!

Season’s Greetings…almost

A confluence of circumstances has kept me from posting anything since I hunkered down and cranked out my calf count summary at the end of October.

I’ve answered approximately three million emails (give or take a handful); I’ve caught up on current events (given the way things are going, I kinda wish I hadn’t); I’ve finally rid my site of hacks that were doing all sorts of funky things (in the worst possible connotation of the word funky); I’ve had a bunch of meetings (both physical and virtual); I’ve helped judge a photo contest; I’ve hit the gym and gotten back into decent shape; I’ve organised most of my trips for next year; I’ve read a pile of research papers about cetaceans and other marine life; I’ve managed to sleep at least a few hours a night; and I’ve even gotten some work done. Whew.

By way of proof that I’ve actually been working, here is a video of sperm whales that Smithsonian Magazine posted recently to complement an article about these amazing animals in the December 2011 issue, titled Call of the Leviathan:

The footage is from recent trips I took to Dominica and Ogasawara to photograph sperm whales. I can’t take credit for the excellent editing though. Brendan, the photo editor at Smithsonian Magazine, did a bang-up job of making my footage look decent. (Thank you Brendan!)

And this is a link to an interview I did with Radio Australia recently about the humpback whales in Tonga. It’s short, but important.

Here’s the audio in case you can’t access the link:

There were suggestions by another person in an earlier interview that humpback whales use their pectoral fins to stroke swimmers in the water, sometimes even lifting swimmers en masse into the air out of exuberance. Poppycock.

I’m the first to admit that being in the water with humpbacks can be a magical, almost mystical, experience, but there’s no good that can come of people visiting Tonga and expecting to be stroked by whales. None whatsoever.

Bruce Hill, the presenter of Radio Australia’s Pacific Beat program, was kind enough to give me an opportunity to set more realistic, and safe, expectations for anyone who might be contemplating a trip to Tonga. (Thanks Bruce!)

Anyway, I’m back at the helm, and I’ll be posting more from now on, including information about upcoming trips.

To get back into the swing of things, here is one of my favourite humpback whale fluke photos. It was a stormy day back in 2005, and it’s the only time I’ve ever seen two adult humpbacks tandem tail-slapping. Their slaps weren’t in sync, plus the seas were rocky, so it took quite a few tries to nail the right timing and composition.

Humpback whales tandem tail-slapping in Tonga
Humpback whales tandem tail-slapping in Tonga

48 Baby Humpback Whales!

48! That’s right…four dozen!!!

That’s the record-breaking number of humpback whale babies that I’ve ID-ed and catalogued since getting back from Tonga several weeks ago.

To put that into some context…that’s 2x the number of babies we counted in 2010.

Moreover, our previous record was 31 mother/ calf pairs (in 2009), meaning that we blew past the high tally two seasons ago by 17! Or to look at it another way, this year’s count trounced the previous high by a factor of more than 1.5x!

In case it’s not entirely obvious, I’m really excited. Like, giddy-little-kid-who-scarfed-down-too-much-halloween-candy excited.

First, because having so many baby whales is obviously terrific news for the ongoing recovery of the southern hemisphere humpback whale population. And second, because it’s vindication.

Back in the day, when I first started visiting Vava’u, the generally accepted wisdom was that there were perhaps a half dozen babies, maybe a few more, that were seen in the area each season. Within short order, I started to believe that there were more. Many more.

In fact, back in 2004, I went out on the proverbial limb (where I have tendency to find myself) and said there might be 40 or more babies in a season.

It’s taken a number of years, but this season’s calf count finally proves that 40 to 50 baby humpback whales in the Vava’u area is not only do-able, but is almost certainly an underestimate in some seasons.

Although I’ve photo-identified 48 mother/ calf pairs, there were many more whales that I either didn’t see, or did see but wasn’t able to ID. In fact, I have a number of photos of mother/ calf pairs that I think are additional ones. The thing is…I can’t be 100% sure, so I haven’t included them. Bummer, but all-in-all, it’s better to be conservative than to incorporate questionable data.

Summary of humpback whale calf sightings in Tonga during the 2011 season
Summary of humpback whale calf sightings in Tonga during the 2011 season

One thing that I want to make clear…even though I’ve put in the time to organise, sort through and compile the data, there are actually a lot of people involved in this effort.

To name but a few: The many people who joined me in Tonga (62 people this season, hundreds more in the past!), who in effect, funded the time to undertake this project; Friends who’ve contributed photos and IDs this season, like Shawn, Douglas, Allan and Ma’ata; Friends like Mark and Karen, who sent me valuable information to help piece together theories about false killer whale attacks and escort relationships; The boat captains and crews (Endangered Encounters, Whale Watch Vava’u), whose dedication to keeping us safe and happy was invaluable; and Takaji and Emiko, who’ve been working with me on this project since we started.

In other words, this project is a group effort, involving dozens of people from all around the world. Thank you very much!!!

Given the high number of whales, the full summary is big. It’s a 64-page PDF file and about 196MB. To make this information as accessible as possible, I’ve prepared two different files available for download. The first is the 15-page summary, which is an overview of the key points but does not contain any of the photo-ID sheets. It is a 3.4MB file.

The second is the full 64-page document, which contains the 15-page summary plus photo-ID sheets for every ID-ed calf. It is 196MB.

Right click on the relevant link below to download the files.

Humpback Whale Calf Encounters in Tonga 2011 – Summary Only (v1, 31 October 2011)
Humpback Whale Calf Encounters in Tonga 2011 – Full File (v1, 31 October 2011)
Humpback Whale Calf Encounters in Tonga 2011 – Full File (v2, 01 November 2011, updated 201142 Faua to show split dorsal fin. Thanks to Robert Pierce for pointing out the split fin!)

In addition, I’ve uploaded all the location data for our calf sightings to two Google Maps. The first is this one, which shows the locations of all of our encounters with humpback whale mother/ calf pairs that I was able to ID:


View 2011 Humpback Whale Calf IDs Tonga in a larger map

The flags represent GPS data; the blue dots are hand-marked locations. I encourage you to click through to the full map, as there are notes for each of the encounters, and it’s much easier to view the information on the full map.

The second is a map that shows the locations of mother/ calf pairs that we encountered, but were unable to establish IDs for. The red pins are mother/ calf pairs I wasn’t able to ID; the green pins are mother/ calf pairs initially marked as unknowns, but later assigned IDs after reviewing photographs. Again, if you click through to the full map, there are notes for each of the sightings.


View 2011 Unidentified Humpback Whale Calf IDs Tonga in a larger map

Finally, in case you have a bad connection and can’t download either file, I’m appending the text of the summary to the end of this post. I can’t, however, include the four summary tables, which set out all the encounters and timelines. The only way to view those is to download one of the two files.

One request: If you have photographs and sighting information for humpback whale mother/ calf pairs from this season that are not in my summary file, please let me know. It would be just so awesome to cross the 50-calf mark!

I will post updated versions of my calf count file as and when additional data comes in.

Here’s the introductory text of my humpback calf count summary for the 2011 season in Vava’u, Kingdom of Tonga:

Introduction
This document is a summary of humpback whale calf encounters in and around the Vava’u island group in the Kingdom of Tonga during the months of August to October 2011.

During our stay this year (05 August to 01 October), we identified 45 humpback whale mother/ calf pairs over the course of 73 in-water encounters, with three additional IDs contributed by friends, for a total of 48 humpback whale mother/ calf pairs.

We initially recorded 33 sightings of calfs that we were unable to identify at the time of encounter. We were later able to assign IDs to two of those 33 in the process of preparing this summary, lowering the total unknown calf sightings to 31.

This is the highest number of mother/ calf pairs we have identified and tabulated since commencing this annual calf count project in 2008.

This season was notable in other respects as well:

  • There were reliable reports of whales arriving in the Vava’u area by mid-June, with calf sightings reported before the end of June. This is several weeks earlier than the timing in a hypothetical average season, and contrasts with the relatively late arrival of the whales in 2010. The whales did not, however, seem to leave the area any earlier than normal.
  • Overall whale behaviour/ disposition was “neutral”, meaning significantly less standoffish than in 2010, but not as approachable as in “friendly” seasons like 2009.
  • We documented three returning mothers. The mother of 201132 Toluua was also the mother of 200913 Luna, easily recognisable by her unique dorsal fin. Of note, her relaxed disposition was the same as it was two years ago, and both juveniles were friendly and inquisitive. The mother of 201107 Fitu was the same as the mother of 200920 Mama’s Boy. And the mother of 201115 Tahanima was the same as the mother of 200814 Jet.
  • We documented three mother/ calf pairs travelling between Vava’u and Toku Island, about 40km away. Travel among islands is not unusual, but it is the first time we have documented this taking place with photographs and GPS data.
  • For the first time, we recorded data pertaining to escort relationships with mother/ calf pairs. Over half of all mother/ calf pair encounters involved at least one escort, which seems to be a relatively high ratio viz. other humpback whale breeding and calving grounds.
  • We documented two long-term associations between an escort and mother/ calf pair: At least 14 days for 201114 Tahafa and at least 18 days for 201142 Faua. This is the first time we have observed/ noticed this. Such long-term associations seem to be unusual, or perhaps not well documented.
  • Of interest, in both cases of long-term escort association, the mother/ calf pairs undertook the 40km journey between Vava’u and Toku while in the company of their respective long-term escorts.
  • We also documented three occasions when escorts with mother/ calf pairs were singing, or vocalising in a song-like manner: 201114 Tahafa, 201121 Uataha and 201130 Tolunoa. We have come across this behaviour on multiple occasions in previous seasons as well.
  • There were two juveniles with all-white pectoral fins, the first we’ve seen in the Vava’u area. They were 201127 Uafitu and 201142 Faua.
  • We documented several juvenile whales with injuries that suggest coordinated attack by a pod of marine mammals, possibly false killer whales (Pseudorca crassidens).

Overall, there was an abundance of whales this season, a lot of interesting social interaction, and many opportunities to observe and record humpback whale behaviour. This document focuses upon the mother/ calf pairs and associated whales. For additional background information, please refer to the following blog posts:

Swimming with Humpback Whales in Tonga | 2011 Season Part 1

Swimming with Humpback Whales in Tonga | 2011 Season Part 2

Swimming with Humpback Whales in Tonga | 2011 Season Part 3

Swimming with Humpback Whales in Tonga | 2011 Season Part 4

Swimming with Humpback Whales in Tonga | 2011 Season Part 5

Swimming with Humpback Whales in Tonga | 2011 Season Part 6

Swimming with Humpback Whales in Tonga | 2011 Season Part 7
Swimming with Humpback Whales in Tonga | 2011 Season Part 8

All of this work has been and is being done on our own time, with our own resources. We are not receiving financial or other assistance, and we are not affiliated with any person or organisation involved with cetaceans.

If you have photographs of humpback whale mother/ calf pairs from the 2011 season in Vava’u that are not included in this file, or additional information about whales already included in this document, please contact Tony Wu.

Reference documents:
2008 Calf Summary, 2009 Calf Summary, 2010 Calf Summary

Methodology

  1. Our basic methodology has remained unchanged since commencing this calf count project, with our core ID team comprising Tony Wu, Takaji Ochi, and Emiko Miyazaki.
  2. We recorded GPS locations for all sightings of humpback whale calfs upon initial visual and/ or radio confirmation. We used Garmin GPS 60 and GPS 72H handheld units for marking GPS locations and converted to Google KML format using HoudahGPS. When GPS units were not available, we marked locations by hand on a map.
  3. Where possible, we entered the water to photograph mother/ calf pairs and other associated whales if any.
  4. We made notes of behaviour, easily recognisable physical traits, and any other noteworthy circumstances.
  5. For the first time, we have recorded the number of escorts with each mother/ calf pair sighting, for the purpose of tracking escort activity from this season onward.
  6. When we were able to take photographs of sufficient quality and quantity to establish an ID, we named and assigned a numerical ID to the relevant calf.
  7. In those cases where we were unable to get sufficient photographs to establish ID, we did not name the calfs. We recorded the sightings as unknowns and cross-checked any photos of such juveniles with subsequent ID-ed whales to look for possible matches.
  8. We have uploaded all the GPS and hand-marked location data to Google Maps, where the locations of all ID-ed calfs and unidentified calfs are available for viewing. GPS locations are also embedded as hyperlinks throughout this document when there is text that refers to date and location of sightings. Clicking the hyperlinks will take you to Google Maps to view the relevant location.
  9. The photographs contained in this document represent a small portion of the images we collected. For most ID-ed calfs, we have many more images for verification purposes.

Observations

  1. Figure 1 below illustrates our cumulative calf counts over the past four seasons (incorporating all ID-ed juvenile whales each season, including those contributed by third parties). While we recognise that there are inherent differences in each season (different periods of stay, varying number of boat days, weather variations, etc.), the slope of the line representing cumulative calf count has appeared relatively similar across previous seasons. With the addition of data for 2011 however, a divergence in the slopes of the curves for 2009 and 2011 from those for 2008 and 2010 is apparent. This makes intuitive sense against the backdrop of the number of calf encounters, overall whale mood and other conditions in each season.
  2. Cumulative count of humpback whale calf IDs in Tonga
    Cumulative count of humpback whale calf IDs in Tonga

  3. During our stay this season, we had 73 encounters with 45 mother/ calf pairs that we identified over 76 boat-days on the water (compared with 22 calf IDs over 81 boat days in 2010; 26 calf IDs over 59 boat days in 2009; 16 calf IDs over 67 boat days in 2008; 14 calf IDs over 53 boat days in 2007). This worked out to 0.59 Calf/ Boat-day, with a boat-day being defined as a single day of approximately six hours on the water on a boat looking for whales. These figures do not include calf IDs contributed by other people.
  4. Graph of humpback whale calf IDs per boat day in Tonga
    Humpback whale calf IDs per boat day in Tonga

  5. As is apparent from Figure 2, this season was exceptional, with the Calf/ Boat-day ratio significantly exceeding the levels recorded in each of the previous seasons. In our 2010 summary, we posited that a Calf/ Boat-day ratio of 0.25 might represent the norm, with 2009 being an outlier. With this season’s ratio of 0.59 however, the question of whether there is a normal level or not becomes more intriguing.
  6. It is certainly possible that our experience in 2011 is exceptional, and that we will not see a similarly high number and density of humpback whale mother/ calf pairs in the Vava’u area in the future. However, given the 0.44 ratio recorded in 2009, and our personal recollections of similarly high numbers and frequency of mother/ calf pair encounters in 2004 and 2005, it seems possible that there is no “norm”, and that the Calf/ Boat-day figure may vary unpredictably within a relatively broad band.
  7. What this underscores is that extrapolating from limited observation in any single season to draw conclusions about the dynamics of the southern hemisphere humpback whale population is inadvisable. Only long-term observation and consistent recording of data may eventually reveal underlying patterns and trends.
  8. In addition to the calf IDs we established, we received three more mother/ calf pair IDs from friends (201115 Tahanima from Shawn; 201143 Fatolu from Douglas, 201148 Favalu from Allan/ Ma’ata), bringing the total ID-ed calf count to 48.
  9. In 2009, we commenced recording sightings of unknown mother/ calf pairs (those whales which we are unable to ID at the time), by marking GPS location, taking notes about behaviour, and taking photos when possible, for the purpose of trying to establish IDs at a later point. This year, we recorded 33 unknown mother/ calf pairs. We were later able to establish IDs for two of those 33 (Unknown calf #10 = 201146 Faono; Unknown calf #27 = 201147 Fafitu), meaning that we ended up with 31 unidentified calfs (compared with 16 in 2010; 24 in 2009).
  10. Figure 3 depicts the total Calf Sighting Ratio for 2009 to 2011, where we have defined Calf Sighting Ratio as = (Total ID-ed calf count + Total unidentified calf count)/ Total boat-days. This ratio was 1.01, which compares with 0.49 for 2010 and 0.85 for 2009. This ratio provides a reasonable indication of the overall level of humpback whale mother/ calf pair activity in the Vava’u area.
  11. Graph ofCalf Sighting Ratio for 2011 Humpback Whale Season in Tonga
    Calf Sighting Ratio for 2011 Humpback Whale Season in Tonga

  12. We again found mother/ calf pairs throughout the entire topography of the Vava’u Island group without apparent clustering or preference for a specific area. As with 2010, however, there were not many sightings in North Bay, once again consistent with our experience from most previous seasons. 2009 was the exception, when we recorded a significant number of encounters in North Bay. We recorded more encounters in the Toku area than in previous seasons. This may, however, have been due to the fact that calm conditions prevailed for a number of days in the latter part of the season, allowing several visits to Toku. See map of ID-ed mother/ calf pairs and map of encounters with unidentified whales.
  13. The pattern of sightings once again supports our notion that, for the most part, humpback whale mother/ calf pairs use Vava’u as a transit area, visiting for a short duration before moving on, returning to the area at a later date in some instances. Within this context however, we have documented a number of repeat sightings over extended periods of time:
    • 201103 Tolu (4 encounters/ 30 days);
    • 201114 Tahafa (9 encounters/ 33 days, Vava’u to Toku to Vava’u);
    • 201120 Uanoa (3 encounters/ 27 days);
    • 201123 Uatolu (2 encounters/ 29 days, Toku to Vava’u);
    • 201130 Tolunoa (2 encounters/ 33 days); and
    • 201142 Faua (2 encounters/ 18 days, Toku to Vava’u).

    This adds to our long-term repeat sightings in previous seasons:

    • 201005 Ikumi (11 encounters/ 31 days);
    • 201008 Lele (3 encounters/ 11 days);
    • 200904 Stitches (4 encounters/ 23 days); and
    • 200912 Luna (3 encounters/ 13 days).
  14. Of note is that in three of the long-term sightings for 2011, the relevant mother/ calf pairs were sighted in both Vava’u and Toku. This is the first time we have documented travel by mother/ calf pairs between the two locations, which are about 40km apart.
  15. As was the case in 2009 and 2010, the ratio of female to male juveniles favoured females. This year, we counted 13 females and 10 males. In 2010, it was 7 female to 4 male. In 2009, it was 14 female to 9 male. Given that this relationship has remained in favour of females for three consecutive seasons, it’s tempting to speculate that females may represent a greater proportion of overall calf births than males. Since it is not possible to establish the sex of every juvenile encountered, we cannot be certain of this however, and need to consider other possible explanations as well. It could be the case, for instance, that mother/ calf pairs with female babies tend to be more favourably disposed to interacting with people.
  16. Graph showing ratio of female to male humpback whale calfs in Tonga
    Ratio of female to male humpback whale calfs in Tonga

  17. We documented long-term escort relationships with two of the mother/ calf pairs sighted over an extended period of time. In the case of 201114 Tahafa, the same escort stayed with the mother/ calf pair from at least 01 September to 14 September (14 days). In the case of 201142 Faua, the same escort remained with mother and calf from at least 20 September to 07 October (18 days). To the best of our knowledge, such long-term escort + mother/ calf relationships have not been documented previously in this area.
  18. Spurred in part by observation of these long-term escort + mother/ calf relationships, we commenced recording escort sightings this season. In several instances, we were able to observe the effects of escorts on mother/ calf behaviour. In some cases, the adult females appeared to dislike the attention of the males; in other cases, the presence of an escort seemed to have a calming effect. We have made notes of such behaviour in the individual ID pages that follow.
  19. Out of 48 ID-ed mother/ calf pairs, 30 were accompanied by escorts in at least one encounter with the relevant mother/ calf pair, a ratio of 0.63. Out of 76 total encounters with those 48 ID-ed mother/ calf pairs, 40 encounters involved at least one escort, a ratio of 0.53. In the case of unidentified mother/ calf pairs, the ratio was 0.35. We only calculated one ratio for unidentified mother/ calf pairs because we had only one encounter with each pair. In any event, the proportion of mother/ calf pairs accompanied by escorts was high. Subjectively, this is consistent with our experience in previous seasons.
  20. Graph showing frequency of escort whales accompanying mother/ calf pairs in Tonga
    Frequency of escort whales accompanying mother/ calf pairs in Tonga

  21. We documented three repeat mothers this season, making a total of five females that we’ve documented returning to the Vava’u area with second babies since 2008.
    • The mother of 201132 Toluua was the same as the mother of 200913 Luna. Her unique dorsal fin made it easy to recognise her, and her overall friendly disposition in both 2009 and 2011 made it relatively easy to photograph her and the calf. Of note, both Toluua and Luna were inquisitive and pro-active in their approach to people in the water.
    • The mother of 201107 Fitu was the same as the mother of 200920 Mama’s Boy.
    • The mother of 201115 Tahanima was the same as the mother of 200814 Jet.

    List of female humpback whales that we've documented returning to Vava'u with a second baby
    Female humpback whales that we’ve documented
    returning to Vava’u with a second baby

  22. We documented several juvenile whales with injuries that suggest coordinated attack by a pod of marine mammals, possibly false killer whales (Pseudorca crassidens). Refer to summary pages for 201107 Fitu, 201114 Tahafa, 201120 Uanoa, and 201144 Fafa to see the wounds. See also this blog post for a discussion of this topic.
  23. We documented two juveniles with all-white pectoral fins: 201127 Uafitu and 201142 Faua. This is interesting because these are the first such calfs we have seen in the Vava’u area. In previous seasons, we had wondered where the adults with all-white pectoral fins come from, as we had not seen any juveniles with this trait.

Just For Fun

In the process of going through many GBs of data to put together my humpback whale calf count summary, I came across the image below.

School of barracuda with humpback whale mother and calf in the background.
School of barracuda with humpback whale mother and calf in the background. Seriously?!!!

It’s certainly not the best photo I’ve ever taken, but hey…how many times do you get to snorkel down to a decent-sized school of barracuda and take a snapshot with a humpback whale mom and baby in the background?!

It would’ve been more effective if the barracuda had been cooperative enough to heed my pleas to: “Turn sideways!”, but the fish were, for whatever reason, horizontally challenged.

Incidentally, I’ve made it through the 45 mother/ calf pairs I ID-ed while in Tonga, and confirmed that I didn’t double-count any of them.

Even better, after careful review of the images, I think I may have two or three more to add to the tally.

If all goes well, I’ll post the summary file and accompanying maps in the next day or two.

Photo Chat: Jon Cornforth

I had a chance to catch up with my friend and fellow photographer Jon Cornforth yesterday.

It’s the first time that we’ve had a chance to talk since July, as I was in Tonga for all of August and September, and Jon was also away for several trips during that time.

A polar bear cub  and mother walking on Barter Island in Alaska, Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
A polar bear cub and mother walking on Barter Island
in Alaska, Arctic National Wildlife Refuge

We mainly caught up on recent events and coordinated a bit for our upcoming Alaska + Tonga Megaptera Mania humpback whale trip next year, but also told each other about a few of the respective highlights of our recent adventures:

Jon told me about his quick trip to the Bahamas to swim with Atlantic spotted dolphins, as well as two trips up north to spend time with brown bears and polar bears.

As a result of our conversation, I now know what bear spray is.

I haven’t the slightest notion of when such knowledge will ever be of use to me (I am sane. I have no immediate plans to stand in front of a hungry, 800-pound bear.), but hey…I learned something new.

Moreover, Jon also taught me that it’s possible to talk in a stern, but not aggressive, voice to brown bears, in order to show them who’s boss.

I should’ve asked Jon to demonstrate for your listening pleasure, but it didn’t occur to me until later. Drat.

Injured humpback whale calf with its mother, long-term escort following closely behind
Injured humpback whale calf with its mother,
long-term escort whale following closely behind

In return, I told Jon about the amazing humpback whale season I had in Tonga, with at least 45 mother/ calf pairs ID-ed. In case it’s not obvious…that’s a lot of baby whales!

I also prattled on for a bit about some interesting, perhaps unique, observations I had this season with humpback whale escorts.

Finally, we spent a few minutes chatting about the open letter that I posted recently as a template for photographers to use when responding to requests for free or dirt-cheap images.

In the few days since I posted that text, I’ve literally received hundreds of emails and other messages from photographers around the world expressing frustration, anger and disappointment with respect to their own experiences.

Responding to all of the communication has taken lots of time, but it’s been educational and rewarding. In particular, I’ve seen lots of mind-blowing photography from viewing everyone’s sites. (Major thanks to Matthew Oldfield for helping out with updating the site!)

From the high number of responses across all areas of photography, it’s clear that this issue is one that resonates across the entire photographic community, as well as other creative professions.

If you’re a photographer, whether well-established or just getting started, it’s an issue you’ll probably have to face, so it might be worth a listen.

Finally, here’s a video Jon posted of himself shooting the polar bear photo above. And no, that’s not automatic weapon fire. It’s the super-amazing shooting speed of the Canon 1D MkIV.