The Vision Thing

I’ve just landed in Port Moresby in Papua New Guinea, and have a couple of days before I get on MV Golden Dawn. Haven’t slept much over the past 72 hours, so in theory, I should crash, but I’m too wired to sleep, and I have an enormous backlog of correspondence and work, as well as scientific documents to read (that should put me to sleep!).

Anyway, while I’m in this semi-conscious, semi-zombie state, I thought it might be worth elaborating a bit more on the vision theme.

I wrote about this topic in my recent article in Wetpixel Quarterly and also in my King Kong crab post a couple of days ago.

In essence, one of the main points I try to get across in workshops, trips with other people and such, is that sometimes what you see is more important than what’s actually there.

Here’s an example of what I mean:

nudibranch

Similar to the thought process I outlined in my post about the King Kong crab, this photo is more of a “this is what I want you to see” than “this is what I saw” image.

What I actually saw was a cute little nudibranch sitting in good afternoon light. What I wanted you to see was a majestic, almost magical animal that popped out from a dark, somewhat ominous Lembeh-esque background.

Whether I succeeded or not is a matter of interpretation, but my point is that if you want to take original photos, it’s often worth pausing to consider the artistic possibilities.

Had I placed one strobe to the right, one strobe to the left, set appropriate shutter, aperture and ISO for a technically correct exposure, no doubt I would have taken a nice photo of an attractive nudibranch, but that’s more of a technical exercise than an artistic endeavour.

Don’t get me wrong. There’s nothing wrong with taking technically spot-on, accurate images. You need to be able to do that without even thinking about it.

But occasionally, when circumstances permit (such as with a non-moving nudibranch), it’s nice to challenge yourself to see something that other people might not see…and then show them.

Oh…one other thing. Nine times out of 10, when I try something different, it doesn’t turn out the way I wanted, or ends up not looking as nice as I envisioned. Sometimes that’s due to a bad concept; other times, it’s because I wasn’t able to work out technical execution. Doesn’t really matter though, because the one time out of 10 that everything works…I end up with something I really like.

In short…you can’t get to the one without going through the first nine.

Tags: , , ,

2 Comments

  1. Laz says:

    Oh great! As if weeding through all my images wasn’t bad enough already. I guess I will start saving all my blurry images considering that with my aging vision that is usually what I see.

    Actually, I am inclined to try filling the frame with a nice colorful critter and then “purposely” (as far as you know) shooting it out of focus. I suppose the same can be done with wide angle, too. One of my favorite things to do while diving is to take off my mask, open my eyes, and swim through a three dimensional hallucinogenic seascape.

    I like the way you think, Tony. I’m looking forward to seeing more of your images from your next adventure. Have fun!

  2. tony says:

    Hi Laz,

    Give it a try!

    I actually hallucinated (due to some sort of rapid-onset fever) when I was in Izu earlier this year with the big squids. Psychedelic colours with 10-armed animals flitting about all around me. Makes for quite a memory :)

    Cheers,

    Tony

Leave a Reply