<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Bit About Work Flow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tonywublog.com/20090710/a-bit-about-work-flow.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tonywublog.com/20090710/a-bit-about-work-flow.html</link>
	<description>Pix and Thoughts about Underwater Photography &#038; Stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:47:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tony</title>
		<link>http://www.tonywublog.com/20090710/a-bit-about-work-flow.html/comment-page-1#comment-6533</link>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 05:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tonywublog.com/?p=1750#comment-6533</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I don&#039;t use Lightroom. In general though, Lightroom isn&#039;t meant for intensive photo editing, even though you can edit in the software. If you can do everything you need in Lightroom, just stick with Lightroom. It&#039;s usually best to stick with the simplest formula</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I don&#8217;t use Lightroom. In general though, Lightroom isn&#8217;t meant for intensive photo editing, even though you can edit in the software. If you can do everything you need in Lightroom, just stick with Lightroom. It&#8217;s usually best to stick with the simplest formula</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shg.cai</title>
		<link>http://www.tonywublog.com/20090710/a-bit-about-work-flow.html/comment-page-1#comment-6527</link>
		<dc:creator>shg.cai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tonywublog.com/?p=1750#comment-6527</guid>
		<description>Hi Tony:
Do you have experience with lightroom? cs3 or lightroom, which work flow you think is better? Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tony:<br />
Do you have experience with lightroom? cs3 or lightroom, which work flow you think is better? Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.tonywublog.com/20090710/a-bit-about-work-flow.html/comment-page-1#comment-6433</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 07:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tonywublog.com/?p=1750#comment-6433</guid>
		<description>You just have to fiddle with the settings until you get a result you like. Unfortunately, the two softwares don&#039;t seem to speak the same language. I can usually get what I want, but sometimes it takes 2-3 tries.

I&#039;m not sure if the color space makes a difference. I use Adobe RGB for everything, and convert to sRGB for web posting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You just have to fiddle with the settings until you get a result you like. Unfortunately, the two softwares don&#8217;t seem to speak the same language. I can usually get what I want, but sometimes it takes 2-3 tries.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure if the color space makes a difference. I use Adobe RGB for everything, and convert to sRGB for web posting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ari</title>
		<link>http://www.tonywublog.com/20090710/a-bit-about-work-flow.html/comment-page-1#comment-6431</link>
		<dc:creator>Ari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 06:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tonywublog.com/?p=1750#comment-6431</guid>
		<description>So I tried DPP. I get beautiful results. But when I bring into Photoshop, the images looks nothing like what I see in DPP.

Is there something I should be doing?
In PS I use the ProPhoto RGB space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I tried DPP. I get beautiful results. But when I bring into Photoshop, the images looks nothing like what I see in DPP.</p>
<p>Is there something I should be doing?<br />
In PS I use the ProPhoto RGB space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.tonywublog.com/20090710/a-bit-about-work-flow.html/comment-page-1#comment-6355</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tonywublog.com/?p=1750#comment-6355</guid>
		<description>Hi Aengus,

Good to hear that you feel the same about DPP.

Now...if we could only have the convenience of Aperture/ Lightroom, the beautiful RAW conversions of DPP and just the basic Photoshop tools...all in one package! That would be the ultimate post-processing software!

Cheers,

Tony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Aengus,</p>
<p>Good to hear that you feel the same about DPP.</p>
<p>Now&#8230;if we could only have the convenience of Aperture/ Lightroom, the beautiful RAW conversions of DPP and just the basic Photoshop tools&#8230;all in one package! That would be the ultimate post-processing software!</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Tony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aengus</title>
		<link>http://www.tonywublog.com/20090710/a-bit-about-work-flow.html/comment-page-1#comment-6354</link>
		<dc:creator>Aengus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tonywublog.com/?p=1750#comment-6354</guid>
		<description>Hi Tony,
I too am a new 5DII owner and must add that I too have become a fan of DPP, it does a much better job than PS for the conversion and as you say, logic says it should since its Canon software with Canon RAW but, even with my 40D and 350D I found the RAW converter in Zoombrowser (can&#039;t use with a 5DII) did a better job than PS!!
Cheers,
Aengus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tony,<br />
I too am a new 5DII owner and must add that I too have become a fan of DPP, it does a much better job than PS for the conversion and as you say, logic says it should since its Canon software with Canon RAW but, even with my 40D and 350D I found the RAW converter in Zoombrowser (can&#8217;t use with a 5DII) did a better job than PS!!<br />
Cheers,<br />
Aengus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.tonywublog.com/20090710/a-bit-about-work-flow.html/comment-page-1#comment-6349</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tonywublog.com/?p=1750#comment-6349</guid>
		<description>Hi Tobias,

Yes. I generally save them back to the same folder if it&#039;s only a few images, or a separate folder if I&#039;m processing a bunch, and then import those into Aperture.

Cheers,

Tony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tobias,</p>
<p>Yes. I generally save them back to the same folder if it&#8217;s only a few images, or a separate folder if I&#8217;m processing a bunch, and then import those into Aperture.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Tony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobias</title>
		<link>http://www.tonywublog.com/20090710/a-bit-about-work-flow.html/comment-page-1#comment-6348</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tonywublog.com/?p=1750#comment-6348</guid>
		<description>Hi Tony,

really nice article, I will try this work flow as well.

But how do you quick-watch your fav images? Do you re-import them into aperture after saving them in PS?

Regards,
Tobias</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tony,</p>
<p>really nice article, I will try this work flow as well.</p>
<p>But how do you quick-watch your fav images? Do you re-import them into aperture after saving them in PS?</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Tobias</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
