Shooting with Compact Cameras

sea lionDuring my past few trips, I’ve had an opportunity to use compact cameras underwater. Clearly, using compact digital cameras isn’t something I’d normally do (as anyone who’s seen my mountain of SLR-related equipment will attest to), but I get asked often about how to take nice photos underwater using compact cameras, so it’s not a bad idea for me to have some experience with them.

Not everyone, after all, wants to spend rent and food money on cameras and lug around 60kg of photo gear (on a light day).

In the interest of full disclosure, I’ve been using compact cameras in conjunction with promotional efforts for Sony, so it’s not exactly like I woke up one day and decided to ditch my SLRs. No…glutton for punishment that I am, I’ll continue to lug around my big, bulky cameras for the foreseeable future.

General Thoughts
It’s perfectly normal to screw up photos the first time you use any new equipment, so I’m not ashamed to say that the first few shots I took with compact cameras were, let’s say, less than stellar and a bit frustrating. Within a couple of dives and with a bit of fiddling around, however, I found my groove and was snapping away.

In the course of using Sony compact cameras (most recently the W300), I’ve learned a few things that I thought I’d share. Many of you who’re using or have used compact cameras may know this stuff already, but it’s new to me.

hawkfish- First, it’s really liberating not to have to spend lots of time setting up equipment. Typically, it takes me 30 minutes or more to set up and test a housing plus lights. Multiply this by 3-4 housings with obligatory sanity breaks in between, and you’ll see it typically takes me a few hours to get ready.

I’m probably overly methodical and cautious, but it’s worth the effort to minimise chances of flooding or other issues (like leaving lens caps on, forgetting to put memory in, etc.).

Setting up the W300 plus a strobe took about five minutes. And that was after taking a break and double-checking everything several times over.

The first time I set the camera up, I literally had no idea what to do with the abundance of extra time and energy I had, so I ended up pestering my travelling companions while they set up their equipment (much to their annoyance no doubt).

- Second, I feel really “light” in the water. Normally I have at least two complete SLR set ups with me, so having a compact camera, even with a strobe, was almost like carrying nothing at all. I didn’t have to fin as hard to get around, which meant my air consumption was better than normal.

- Finally, shooting with a compact camera required, at least for me, an entirely different way of looking at things.

With my SLRs, I shoot mostly at the extremes…extremely wide (fisheye) and extremely narrow (super-macro). I tend to spend less time with “normal” lens perspectives.

It’s certainly possible to shoot wide and macro with compact cameras (particularly with the help of add-on lenses), but not to the same degree as I do with my SLRs, so I had to “adapt” my vision, so to speak, to seeing in normal lens perspectives…which isn’t easy after so many years of training myself to see what other people normally don’t see at the extremes.

Underwater Mode
Other than these general observations, which shouldn’t come as any major surprise, there is one specific function on my compact that was a revelation for me…the underwater mode. This is a function that’s built into many compact cameras, and it’s something I think is worth knowing about if you have a compact camera and don’t already use this capability.

The basic idea is that when you dive, you switch the camera to underwater mode, and the camera will adjust colours to make your images look less blue-green and “blah”…you know, the typical look you get if you shoot in automatic mode. Blues should look blue, and pretty fish and corals should look pretty instead of washed out.

Before I actually tested this function on my W300, I imagined that it would act like a colour filter…adding reds and other warm colours back at shallow depths, but perhaps not work so well at depth.

What I observed was that it does precisely this, but seems to do it in an “intelligent” fashion and adjusts…to a certain degree…for depth and other ambient conditions.

Here’s what I mean: When you use a colour filter, the colour-correcting capability of the filter is preset. In order words, the extent of “warmth” that you add back is pre-determined by the pigment mix of the filter. So the effectiveness of colour filters can be limited to specific conditions and circumstances. This was particularly the case during film days (Film? What’s that?).

With the advent of digital cameras, it’s been possible to improve the effectiveness of add-on filters, as popularised by Magic Filters, created by my friends Alex Mustard and Peter Rowlands. I’ve used magic filters with my SLRs and still do so on occasion.

What’s cool about the underwater mode in my W300 is that it appears to adjust white balance on-the-fly, without the need for filters, while achieving a pleasing effect similar to what you get with the use of filters.

The examples below show you some results obtained just by switching between P mode (programmed auto) and the preset underwater mode. No flash, no filters, no tricks, no special skills…but pretty dramatic differences.

soft coral

hard coral

I don’t know precisely how the camera adjusts the images, but from looking at the “before” and “after” histograms, it seems like the camera automatically uses the histogram to calculate and apply a white balance modification.

histogram

If you don’t know what the histograms mean, don’t worry. Basically what I’m saying is that I think the camera determines how much warmth (red/ orange/ yellow) to add back, and how much to amend the cool colours (blue, cyan, green)…giving you prettier pictures without the need for any extra equipment, filters, or other devices.

From the photos above, whatever the camera is doing, it clearly works. What this means in practical terms is that with just your compact digital camera and a normal housing, you can take nice, colourful photos. There’s no need to get fancy or invest in anything else. (Of course, if you do add extra stuff like lenses, strobes, etc., you can get even better results, but that’s another topic altogether.)

The underwater mode worked best for me at relatively shallow depths (though even at 22 metres, the colour adjustments were apparent), shooting with the light instead of against it (sun above or at your back, pointing the camera horizontally or down).

I’ve only tried it on a couple of dives in nice, tropical-blue waters, so I’m not sure yet how the function will perform under other circumstances…something I’ll explore further on upcoming trips.

Summary
So if you’re one of the many divers who has a compact camera, you might want to check to see if it has an underwater mode. As I mentioned above, the particular camera I was using was a Sony W300, but I’m certain that this function has also been incorporated in cameras produced by other manufacturers.

What I don’t know is how many people actually makes use of this useful tool. Judging from the many blue- or green-cast photos I see on web forums and photo-sharing sites though, I think most people don’t.

Give it a try, and let me know what you think.

14 Comments

  1. Eric Cheng says:

    Hey, Tony — those images look great! I’m going to link this article from Wetpixel.

  2. Tim says:

    There’s such a mode on my Lumix TZ15 so I’m going to give it a try.

    Thanks Tony for the heads up!

  3. ajay says:

    AFAIK, in most cameras the UW mode is part of
    the ‘fully-programmed’ modes, whereas I often find Aperture- or Shutter-priority modes useful depending on the dof and fast/slow moving creatures in the scene. If indeed UW is doing some intelligent ‘adjust levels’ then why don’t manufacturers allow it as an option in all modes ? Until then, IMO, as a user it’s better to use Av/Tv/M, and (grin) post-process.

  4. tony says:

    Ajay,

    I agree it would be nicer to have the uw mode functionality usable w/ aperture and shutter modes, and I don’t know why manufacturers don’t incorporate it (i.e., business reason or technical reason).

    If you know how to post-process photos, then you’re ahead of the game and may not need this functionality. I wrote this primarily for people who either don’t know how or don’t want to post-process, and just want an easy “no-brainer” way to get nice colours.

  5. Sarel says:

    Hi, I just won a professional competition with my compact digital. There were over 130 entrants and a good 60% of competitors used SLR cameras. I used a very common point-and-shoot with one strobe.

    http://www.shootout.co.za/

    Go compact!!

  6. Tim Rock says:

    Hey Tony,

    That’s the 13+ MP camera, yes? How sharp is the lens? This may be the next step in travelling light! Did you use the Sony housing and the wide angle attachment? Get it in Japan?

    Nice shots and review. I am very curious about this one, especially if the airlines are going to start charging for Bag #2.

    Best,

    Tim of a Million Questions Rock

  7. Laz says:

    The Canon point and shoot cameras have the underwater setting available as part of the white balance setting so it is available for all shooting modes including video.

  8. Dave says:

    Hey Tony,

    I’m thinking of getting a Siny W300. What underwater housing did you use as I am having trouble finding one anywhere for this camera.

  9. Steve says:

    Hi Tony,

    Same question as posted before…What housing did you use for the Sony W300? The same used for the W200?

    Many thanks,
    Steve

  10. tony says:

    Hi Steve,

    Hmmm, I’m getting this question a lot, so probably best to post the answer here.

    I used a normal housing that Sony sells for most of its compact cameras. I’m not sure if it’s the same as for the W200 or not, but you can see it here:

    http://tinyurl.com/6m28yl

    Cheers,

    Tony

  11. Fe All says:

    The biggest problem with compacts underwater is the shooting lag. It is longer than above the water for a lot of reasons – lower light levels and harsher AF environment.

    Shooting a static sceene with a compact UW is no problem. Moving and fast moving targets are. Even with some realy fast compacts.

    Oly was once leader in affordable UW photography. Canon desided to grab that market share from Olympus and now 99% of Canon compacts have a dedicated UW housing and. moreover, these are available. Sony decided to join the UW race reasoning that availability of UW capability might be a decisive factor for a compact model type/brand purchase (despite that it might be used in UW role 5-10 days a year only) for certain audiences. So more and more SONY’s have now UW housing at least listed in the Accessories Lists. Availability is another story.

  12. Peter V says:

    Tony,
    May I ask what external flash you tried with the Sony W300 ?
    How were the results ? Any advice on settings ?
    Thanks for this article.
    Peter V

  13. Clark Miller says:

    Hi Tony,

    I am suppose to be in Tonga with Doug Hoffman and Mark Strickland on the 15th. Air Fiji has not been flying the last week because they have not paid their fuel bill. So, I’ve paid for my tickets and do not have a flight from Tongatapu to Vavau.

    Do you know anything about what’s is going on and how other people are getting to the boats in Vavau.

    Any information would be most helpful. I can be e-mail at clark.miller@lpl.com or clark@aquaterraimagery.com

    Thanks
    Clark Miller

  14. Shooter says:

    I really enjoyed reading your interesting yet very informative insight. Shooting beautiful sceneries and events really fascinates me and puts my creative imagination at work. Thank you for sharing and I am looking forward to reading more of your very current blog postings!!! :D Shooter Game

Leave a Reply